Is Chad Bianco a Danger to the USA? A "Former" Member of The Oath Keepers... Famous for the January 6th Failed Insurrection at the US Capitol. He is a Candidate for Governor of California in the 2026 election.

Chad Bianco is an American law enforcement officer, who has served as sheriff of Riverside County, California, since 2019. A member of the Republican Party, Bianco has been affiliated with the Oath Keepers. ACAB = 1312

Bianco moved from Utah to California in 1989,^[10] and in 1993 attended the San Bernardino Sheriff's Academy. 

The Oath Keepers is a far-right, anti-government extremist militia group in the United States, composed largely of current and former military personnel, law enforcement officers, and first responders. Founded in 2009 by Elmer Stewart Rhodes, the group is known for its conspiratorial, anti-government ideology and has played a significant role in several armed confrontations with federal authorities, culminating in their involvement in the January 6, 2021, Failed Capitol insurrection.

Police are Killing Themselves in Record Numbers - What Can We Do To Help Them? Maybe Retraining to a USEFUL Profession?

I Feel Sorry for These People... They Just Made a Mistake in Career Choice... Instead of Suicide, Why Not Choose a DIFFERENT Line of Work? Maybe Something of VALUE? Ya THINK? 
https://www.addictioncenter.com/news/2019/09/police-at-highest-risk-for-suicide-than-any-profession/

I Believe That They Can Be Retrained to Do Useful Work... 
https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-police-officer-suicide-rate

Maybe The Endless Ridicule By The Citizens of the USA is Just Too Much? Bad Cop, No Donut!
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/record-number-us-police-officers-died-suicide-2019/story?id=68031484

The Police Ought To Stop Murdering Unarmed Black Men. It Cost the City of Sacramento $2.4 Million Dollars for Stephon Clark. HEY PORKERS, STOP DOING THAT!

The city of Sacramento, California, will pay $2.4 million to the children of Stephon Clark, the unarmed black man whose killing by police last year led to a week of protests after prosecutors declined to press charges.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-courts/stephon-clark-s-children-split-2-4-million-settlement-n1064461

Video shows Minneapolis cop with knee on neck of motionless, moaning man who later died.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minneapolis-police-george-floyd-died-officer-kneeling-neck-arrest/

Does Murdering Unarmed Black Men 
Really Make America Great Again? 

Police Cars at Tree Sit in Freshwater, California
(Near Eureka)
a Bizarre Example of Police
Going Nuts in Service of their
Corporate Masters...
MAXXAM SUXX
(Formerly Pacific Lumber)

Police Get Away With Murder in the "I Can't Breathe" Case. Eric Garner was Choked to death by NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo... Who was excused because prosecutors could not successfully prove the officer acted willfully... WILLFULLY?

Attorney General William Barr made the decision not to bring charges against Pantaleo due to concerns that prosecutors could not successfully prove the officer acted willfully.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/16/us/eric-garner-death-five-years-later/index.html

So, What The Fuct does "Acted WILLFULLY" really mean? Murder is Legal? We ALL SAW THE VIDEO... It LOOKS like he intentionally Choked Eric to Death... but... "AWW, Let's Just Give Him a MULLIGAN..."  It was an Accident... Shucks... Can't Expect Killer Cops to be Perfect, Can You?

WILLFULLY
Committed voluntarily and purposely, with the specific intent to do something; voluntarily and intentionally assisting or advising another to do something that the person knows disobeys or disregards the law. A person does not act "willfully" if the person acts as a result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law.

Intent and motive should not be confused. Motive is what prompts a person to act, while intent refers to the state of mind with which the act is done.

So, if the acts constituting a crime were committed by someone voluntarily as an intentional violation of a known legal duty, that is, with specific intent to do something the law forbids, then the element of "willfulness" has been satisfied even though the person may have believed that his conduct was [religiously, politically or morally] required, or that ultimate good would result from such conduct.


On the other hand, if there's a reasonable doubt as to whether someone acted in good faith, sincerely believing himself to be exempt by the law [e.g. from the withholding of income taxes], then he did not intentionally violate a known legal duty, that is, he did not act "willfully". https://www.lectlaw.com/def2/w014.htm