My Newest Music Video: "Putin: Stuck in Ukraine Again" - Based on LODI by Creedence Clearwater Revival.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAB8JR2z3k

(G D C G)

Just about a Year Ago, Vlad was Setting Out from Old Moscow... (G C G)

Seeking to Bring Chernobyl, Back into the USSR... (Em C D)

The War Got Bad, The War Got Worse... (G Em)

The Russian People Got Screwed... (C G)

Pravda, Stuck in Ukraine Again... (G D C G)

If I Only Had a Ruble, For Every Soldier Dead... (G C G)

for every time we bombed a school, while children studied math... (Em C D)

I could buy a Tractor and (G Em)

Start Me a Communal Farm... (C G)

Pravda, Stuck in Ukraine Again... (G D C G)

The Man from CNN, Said we were Gonna Lose... (G C G)

Just Like in Afghanistan, We're Doomed to Bad News... (Em C D)

When the Babuskas Rise Up... (G Em)

It's time to Run Away! (C G)

Pravda, Stuck in Ukraine Again. (G D C G)

Original Recording by CCR:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIfQNB5WXmY

Chords and Lyrics:

https://tabs.ultimate-guitar.com/tab/creedence-clearwater-revival/lodi-chords-1048967

THORIUM Nuclear Power: A Practical Alternative to Uranium Fission - It Makes a Low Amount of Radioactive Waste, Unlikely to Meltdown, Abundant Fuel.

In 2021, Russia provided US nuclear utilities with 14 percent of their uranium purchases. We Can Mine Our Own Thorium... 

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/thorium.aspx

Thorium fuel cycles offer attractive features, including lower levels of waste generation, less transuranic elements in that waste, and providing a diversification option for nuclear fuel supply. Also, the use of thorium in most reactor types leads to extra safety margins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium-based_nuclear_power

Thorium-based nuclear power generation is fueled primarily by the nuclear fission of the isotope uranium-233 produced from the fertile element thorium. A thorium fuel cycle can offer several potential advantages over a uranium fuel cycle^{[Note 1]}—including the much greater abundance of thorium found on Earth, superior physical and nuclear fuel properties, and reduced nuclear waste production. One advantage of thorium fuel is its low weaponization potential; it is difficult to weaponize the uranium-233/232 and plutonium-238 isotopes that are largely consumed in thorium reactors.

THORIUM Button For Sale

https://www.zazzle.com/thorium_button-145534106146810400

China prepares to test thorium-fueled nuclear reactor...

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02459-w

Scientists are excited about an experimental nuclear reactor using thorium as fuel, which is about to begin tests in China. Although this radioactive element has been trialled in reactors before, experts say that China is the first to have a shot at commercializing the technology.

VIDEOS: 

Thorium can give humanity clean, pollution free energy | Kirk Sorensen | TEDxColoradoSprings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kybenSq0KPo

~~~~~~ (~);-} ~~~~~~

The Thorium Dream

https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/thorium-dream/

~~~~~~ (~);-} ~~~~~~

Thorium: An Energy Solution

https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/thorium-energy-solution/

~~~~~~ (~);-} ~~~~~~

Revisiting Thorium Energy - The Future of Nuclear Power? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv6qt45lXDM

~~~~~~ (~);-} ~~~~~~

Making Safe Nuclear Power from Thorium | Thomas Jam Pedersen | TEDxCopenhagen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHO1ebNxhVI

~~~~~~ (~);-} ~~~~~~

Andrew Yang Wants a Thorium Reactor by 2027.

https://www.wired.com/story/andrew-yang-wants-a-thorium-reactor-by-2027-good-luck-buddy/

No one in the world is ahead of India in thorium fuelled nuclear reactor... 
https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/National/2016-05-30/None-in-the-world-is-ahead-of-India-in-thorium-fuelled-nuclear-reactor/231350

I'm Glad to Educate America's Youth... Explaining How Things Are in Actual Reality as Opposed to What They See On TV is a Worthy Use of my time... NO NUKES!

 

Nuclear Meltdown In a Cartoon Show...
NOT REALITY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster

The Chernobyl disaster was a nuclear accident that occurred on 26 April 1986 near the city of Pripyat in the north of the Ukrainian SSR in the Soviet Union.^[1][2] It is considered the worst nuclear disaster in history both in cost and casualties.^[3]

F*ck You Shima Nuclear Disaster... 

Free Coloring Book:
Make as many Prints as you like and
pass 'em on th Friends!

Some Guy on FaceBorg Stated: 

Nuclear power may be a coming good stock option, as people on the left slowly recognize it is the only quick way to replace fossil fuels. And people on the right may deny climate change as a whole, but they generally have less resistance to nuclear power anyway, to them it's just more electricity to avoid brownouts and run air conditioners, etc.

I Replied: Nuclear power takes a long time to build... Nothing quick about it... and Usually It''s Over budget with missed deadlines... and More Missed Deadlines... and Radioactive waste that has to be stored safely and guarded for 10,000 years... that' why the Executives at PG&E, SoCal Edison and SMUD all say NO NUKES! Those people are not fooled by propaganda.

So what would you replace fossil fuels with? I support solar, hydro, geothermal, and wind, but the raw materials to build all the batteries, panels, controls etc aren't there yet with solar and wind to replace fossil fuels, Germany and Cali are suffering brown outs, not acceptable to most people. So what is your kilowatt-ready solution?

I Replied: Drive Cars Less... Cut driving in Half. Build more Dams for hydro. Build Stationary Bicycle Power Generators... Cut Jet airplane travel in Half... Invent Better air Conditioners... Invent Better Heaters... like pumping air from deep underground... build houses out of thick adobe walls and tile roofs... They are Automatically the right temp... Just like the Missions in California...

Some Guy Said:

as soon as that happens somewhere (Like Cali or Germany) I'll take it seriously. Meanwhile, the brown-outs and fossil fuel use are increasing in those "Green" places.

I Replied:

Meme Showing How to Cut Driving Cars in Half... Massive Savings of Fossil Fuel... You KNOW That we can do this... WE JUST DID... Working from Home is Ecological and it frees people from wasting two hours a day stuck in traffic... For Years I rode the bus to work in Eureka and San Jose... It's Great!

 

I Replied: 

Whatever You Do... Do NOT Buy Stock in a Company that Makes Nuclear Power Plants. LEARN from History... Westinghouse went bankrupt due to Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant and GE lost a Fortune due to their Fukushima Reactors... Handy Stock Market Tips! Valuable Info! This isn't "Political" It's a Valid Study of Reality... Scott McCord obviously Has Not Studied the Market... and is giving bad advice...

SMUD SAYS NO NUKES! Just Too Damn Expensive! The Rancho Seco plant operated from April 1975 to June 1989, with a lifetime capacity factor of less than 40%; it was closed by public vote in June 1989 (53% to 47%) after half of its intended lifetime primarily for economic reasons: ratepayers had seen their rates doubled in the last four years to pay for improvements to the plant, and electricity from natural gas was priced at half that of the electricity generated by Rancho Seco. (2.3 cents / kWh, vs. 5.4 cents / kWh)[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rancho_Seco_Nuclear_Generating_Station

~~~~~~ (~);-} ~~~~~~

*JUST JOKING* A Step by Step Guide to the Violet Overgrow of the Ruling Class - A Novel by Gregory Vanderlaan *JUST JOKING*

Step #1: 

Boycott Everything Until Prices Come Down. 

Corporations owned by the 1% keep on raising prices and collecting windfall profits. They will keep on doing that until people quit buying. If they could, they would charge $100.00 for a Quart of Milk... 

Step #2: Sneak Marijuana Cookies onto the Buffet Tables of the Hotels near Capitol Hill in Washington DC. If the "Suits" that Run the Government had a Cannabis Trip... maybe they would think twice about doing evil for a living. Place some Cannabis Edibles in the Senate Dining Room also... At the very least they would change the CrazyLaws® about Marijuana... 

Step #3: Cut the Pentagon Budget in Half. This will really anger the Ruling Class as They Profit Greatly from Corporate Welfare. Remember: Since 1945 the US Military has Never Defended the USA... Not Even Once... So all that money being spent at the Pentagon is Just a Way to Transfer Wealth from the Taxpayers to the Owners of Defense Corporations...  The same Owners Finance the Campaigns of the Senators and Congressmen that Write the Bills that Fund the Pentagon... So the Money Travels in a Tight Circle... and YOU GET NOTHING... 

Step #4: Stop Funding Fossil Fuel Corporations. "U.S. taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars a year subsidizing new fossil fuel exploration, production, and consumption, which directly affects how much oil, natural gas, and coal gets produced—and how much clean energy doesn’t." https://generation180.org/the-absurd-truth-about-fossil-fuel-subsidies/

Step #5: YOUR IDEA HERE! Email Me: gregvan (at) yahoo (dot) com 

READ MORE: https://gvan42.blogspot.com/2018/03/digital-monkeywrench-silly-science.html

SOLAR, WIND, HYDRO & BIOMASS are Cheaper than Nuclear Power Plants... That's Why We Aren't Building any Nukes. That and the Radioactive Waste That has to be Stored and Guarded for 10,000 Years... To Prevent Terrorists from Building a Dirty Bomb...

The Danger of A Crazy Man Simply Placing a Traditional Bomb Under A Cask of Atomic Waste is IMMENSE... Sometime During the 10,000 Years That Nuclear Waste is Actively Radioactive, It's Almost Certain that a "WhackJob" will Blow It Up!

Unemployed Physics Graduates Can't Get a Job in the Nuclear Power Industry so they Write Magazine Articles all about how wonderful Nukes Are... and Make Pro Nuke Videos...

In 1976 PG&E Said NO NUKES! and Shut it Down... The Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3 was a 63 MWe boiling water reactor, owned by Pacific Gas and Electric Company that operated from August 1963 to July 1976 just south of Eureka, California... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humboldt_Bay_Nuclear_Power_Plant

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKJ_73_8kzo

Power - No Nukes concert

 Remember: The Only Good Nuke is a Decommissioned Nuke... Shut 'em DOWN!

What is the main reason why fewer nuclear power plants are being built today compared to 40 years ago? Nuclear power plants have become too expensive to generate electricity at a reasonable cost. Which of the following accurately describes the use of fossil fuels for energy?

https://web.archive.org/web/20110825210125/
http://redwoodalliance.dreamhosters.com/files/10-98NFT.pdf

Humboldt Nuke Faces Dismantling By Jim Adams Twenty-two years after shutdown, PG&E’s Humboldt Bay Nuclear Power Plant may become the first commercial reactor to be dismantled or decommissioned in the US. A major project got underway in September as the 250 ft. tall concrete vent stack began to be demolished. The utility has also announced its intent to remove 390 spent (irradiated) fuel rods from the pool at the plant, and place them in on-site steel containers called dry casks. For more than a decade, Redwood Alliance has urged PG&E to take this action. This will keep our community safe and allow complete dismantling to take place. Four miles south of Eureka and adjacent to Humboldt Bay, the Humboldt nuke sits on top of and close to major earthquake faults. The Alliance has worked since 1978 to make sure that the nuclear plant, one of the oldest and dirtiest in the country, would never reopen and will be properly dismantled.

The Nyonoksa radiation accident occurred on 8 August 2019 near Nyonoksa, Russian Federation. Five military and civilian specialists were killed and three (or six, depending on the source) were injured.[1][2][3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyonoksa_radiation_accident

American intelligence officials are racing to understand a mysterious explosion that released radiation off the coast of northern Russia last week, apparently during the test of a new type of nuclear-propelled cruise missile hailed by President Vladimir V. Putin as the centerpiece of Moscow’s arms race with the United States.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-energy-nuclearpower/nuclear-energy-too-slow-too-expensive-to-save-climate-report-idUSKBN1W909J

Nuclear power is losing ground to renewables in terms of both cost and capacity as its reactors are increasingly seen as less economical and slower to reverse carbon emissions, an industry report said.

https://www.vox.com/2014/8/1/5958943/nuclear-power-rise-fall-six-charts

Nuclear power is slowly going out of style. Back in 1996, atomic energy supplied 17.6 percent of the world's electricity. Today that's down to just 10.8 percent — and it could drop even further in the years ahead.

https://eu.boell.org/en/2021/04/26/7-reasons-why-nuclear-energy-not-answer-solve-climate-change

The 7 reasons why nuclear energy is not the answer to solve climate change.

Analysis: New nuclear power costs about 5 times more than onshore wind power per kWh. Nuclear takes 5 to 17 years longer between planning and operation and produces on average 23 times the emissions per unit electricity generated. In addition, it creates risk and cost associated with weapons proliferation, meltdown, mining lung cancer, and waste risks. Clean, renewables avoid all such risks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Susana_Field_Laboratory

The hot lab suffered a number of fires involving radioactive materials. For example, in 1957, a fire in the hot cell "got out of control and ... massive contamination" resulted.[23]

At least four of the ten nuclear reactors suffered accidents: 1) The AE6 reactor experienced a release of fission gases in March 1959.[24] 2) In July 1959, the SRE experienced a power excursion and partial meltdown that released 28 Curies of radioactive noble gasses. The release resulted in the maximum off-site exposure of 0.099 millirem and an exposure of 0.018 millirem for the nearest residential building which is well within current limits today.[25] 3) In 1964, the SNAP8ER experienced damage to 80% of its fuel. 4) In 1969 the SNAP8DR experienced similar damage to one-third of its fuel.[24]

A radioactive fire occurred in 1971, involving combustible primary reactor coolant (NaK) contaminated with mixed fission products.[26][27]

The reactors located on the grounds of SSFL were considered experimental, and therefore had no containment structures. Reactors and highly radioactive components were housed without the large concrete domes that surround modern power reactors.[citation needed]

and then a Guy of FaceBorg Said:  

I recommend this page, 

https://www.facebook.com/timetogonuclear/posts/4855025154545048

it debunks the lies about "radiation deaths" supposedly caused by nuclear power. Give it an honest try. I used to be against nuclear power, 3 Mile Island was closed, and yet there was no radiation or damage outside the plant itself. Even Fukishima radiation was down to backround levels within a few hundred yards of the plant. Wildlife is everywhere around Chernobyl, with no observed radiation problems. This site will respond to your arguments against nuclear power with reason and demonstrable statisitics to back their argument that it is safe. I support Solar and Wind power, but it is nowhere near being able to completely replace fossil fuels, just ask Germany, with their new gas pipeline coming from Russia.

Why did the Nuclear Waste policy act fail? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Waste_Policy_Act

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 is a United States federal law which established a comprehensive national program for the safe, permanent disposal of highly radioactive wastes. 

The Nuclear Waste Fund previously received $750 million in fee revenues each year and had an unspent balance of $44.5 billion as of the end of FY2017.^[8] However (according to the Draft Report by the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future), actions by both Congress and the Executive Branch have made the money in the fund effectively inaccessible to serving its original purpose. The commission made several recommendations on how this situation may be corrected.^[9]

In December 1987, Congress amended the Nuclear Waste Policy Act to designate Yucca Mountain, Nevada, as the only site to be characterized as a permanent repository for all of the nation's nuclear waste.^[11] The plan was added to the fiscal 1988 budget reconciliation bill signed on December 22, 1987.

On March 5, 2009, Energy Secretary Steven Chu told a Senate hearing the Yucca Mountain site is no longer viewed as an option for storing reactor waste.^[19] 

https://cen.acs.org/environment/pollution/nuclear-waste-pilesscientists-seek-best/98/i12

Regardless of whether you are for or against nuclear power, and no matter what you think of nuclear weapons, the radioactive waste is already here, and we have to deal with it.”

That’s Gerald S. Frankel’s matter-of-fact take on the thousands of metric tons of used solid fuel from nuclear power plants worldwide and the millions of liters of radioactive liquid waste from weapons production that sit in temporary storage containers in the US. While these waste materials, which can be harmful to human health and the environment, wait for a more permanent home, their containers age. In some cases, the aging containers have already begun leaking their toxic contents.

“It’s a societal problem that has been handed down to us from our parents’ generation,” says Frankel, who is a materials scientist at the Ohio State University. “And we are—more or less—handing it to our children.”

IN BRIEF:

More than a quarter million metric tons of highly radioactive waste sits in storage near nuclear power plants and weapons production facilities worldwide, with over 90,000 metric tons in the US alone. Emitting radiation that can pose serious risks to human health and the environment, the waste, much of it decades old, awaits permanent disposal in geological repositories, but none are operational. With nowhere to go for now, the hazardous materials and their containers continue to age. That unsustainable situation is driving corrosion experts to better understand how steel, glass, and other materials proposed for long-term nuclear waste storage containers might degrade. Read on to learn how these researchers’ findings might help protect people and the environment from waste leakages.

~~~~~~ (~);-} ~~~~~~

*JUST JOKING* A Step by Step Guide to the Violet Overgrow of the Ruling Class - A Novel by Gregory Vanderlaan *JUST JOKING*

Step #1: 

Boycott Everything Until Prices Come Down. 

Corporations owned by the 1% keep on raising prices and collecting windfall profits. They will keep on doing that until people quit buying. If they could, they would charge $100.00 for a Quart of Milk... 

Step #2: Sneak Marijuana Cookies onto the Buffet Tables of the Hotels near Capitol Hill in Washington DC. If the "Suits" that Run the Government had a Cannabis Trip... maybe they would think twice about doing evil for a living. Place some Cannabis Edibles in the Senate Dining Room also... At the very least they would change the CrazyLaws® about Marijuana... 

Step #3: Cut the Pentagon Budget in Half. This will really anger the Ruling Class as They Profit Greatly from Corporate Welfare. Remember: Since 1945 the US Military has Never Defended the USA... Not Even Once... So all that money being spent at the Pentagon is Just a Way to Transfer Wealth from the Taxpayers to the Owners of Defense Corporations...  The same Owners Finance the Campaigns of the Senators and Congressmen that Write the Bills that Fund the Pentagon... So the Money Travels in a Tight Circle... and YOU GET NOTHING... 

Step #4: Stop Funding Fossil Fuel Corporations. "U.S. taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars a year subsidizing new fossil fuel exploration, production, and consumption, which directly affects how much oil, natural gas, and coal gets produced—and how much clean energy doesn’t." https://generation180.org/the-absurd-truth-about-fossil-fuel-subsidies/

Step #5: YOUR IDEA HERE! Email Me: gregvan (at) yahoo (dot) com 

READ MORE: https://gvan42.blogspot.com/2018/03/digital-monkeywrench-silly-science.html

NO NUKES! Biden's Infrastructure Plan Includes Taxpayer Funding for Nuclear Power Plants. THAT'S CRAZY!

I Wrote to President Biden, Both My Senators and My Congressman and Said:

"No Nukes! President Biden Admits That There Will Be Funding for Nuclear Power Plants included in the Infrastructure Bill. That's Insane. The Rest of the Bill Sounds Great but... Spending  Taxpayer Money on a Technology that has been Proven to be a Failure is Not Wise. The Engineers at PG&E, SMUD and SoCal Edison Have Completely Given Up on Nuclear Power.  However... It's Costing the Customers $9.2 Billion Dollars to Clean up Diablo Canyon and San Onofre....  Please Remove all Funding for Nuclear Power From this Bill." 

Atomic Waste Casks at PGE Abandoned
Nuclear Power Plant Near Eureka, California

White House Wants Nuclear in Clean Energy Mandate, McCarthy Says... Nuclear energy should be one of the power sources eligible for a national clean energy mandate sought by the White House as part of its infrastructure plan, presidential climate adviser Gina McCarthy told reporters.

McCarthy’s remarks on Thursday came amid concern about the carbon-free fuel source from progressives and some environmentalists who have qualms about radioactive waste and uranium mining for reactor fuel.

Inclusion of nuclear in the so-called Clean Energy Standard, which requires the generation of clean power, could be a boon for companies including NuScale Power LLC, TerraPower LLC, Westinghouse Electric Co., General Electric Co., and Exelon Corp.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-01/white-house-wants-nuclear-in-clean-energy-mandate-mccarthy-says

  Source: https://joebiden.com/clean-energy/

Innovation: Drive dramatic cost reductions in critical clean energy technologies, including battery storage, negative emissions technologies, the next generation of building materials, renewable hydrogen, and advanced nuclear – and rapidly commercialize them, ensuring that those new technologies are made in America.

https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Nuclear-investments-included-in-Bidens-American-Jo